Do National Security Communication Campaigns Work? Taking a Lesson from the Public Health Sector

This RAND report draws on a systematic review of 41 meta-analytic and systematic reviews of public health communication campaigns to extract lessons applicable to U.S. national security communications—including the Army psychological operations forces' inform, influence, and persuade campaigns in support of overseas contingency operations. The authors note that national security campaigns are rarely subjected to rigorous evaluation because of unstable operating environments and political sensitivities, leaving the public health literature as the closest available evidence base for understanding what makes a communication campaign actually work.

Read now on Rand.org →

Previous
Previous

Enlisting Madison Avenue: The Marketing Approach to Earning Popular Support in Theaters of Operation

Next
Next

Violent Extremism in America: Interviews with Former Extremists and Their Families on Radicalization and Deradicalization